September 13, 2014

Joan Rivers' Doctor No Longer Performing Procedures

by Levin & Perconti

Earlier this month beloved comedian Joan Rivers passed away. It is still unclear precisely what caused her death in a New York hospital. Whether her death was the result of a surgical error or some other form of medical malpractice is not yet known. However, what is known is that the doctor who was performing a procedure on her when she became ill is no longer performing procedures.

Doctor No Longer Performing Procedures

ABC News reports that the doctor who performed the endoscopy on Joan Rivers shortly before she went into cardiac arrest has been asked to step down at Yorkville Endoscopy. The doctor, Dr. Lawrence Cohen, is the clinic's former medical director and is a gastroenterologist. The clinic told ABC News that Dr. Cohen, “is not currently performing procedures at Yorkville Endoscopy; nor is he currently serving as medical director.” The clinic gave no official reason, but an unnamed source said that the doctor was asked to step down because he allowed a specialist who was not authorized to practice at the clinic to examine Ms. Rivers.

The New York Daily News reports that an unnamed source claims that an ear, nose and throat specialist who accompanied Ms. Rivers to the clinic performed an unplanned biopsy on her vocal cords. The clinic denies that the procedure occurred. However, the source claims that the procedure did occur once something was spotted on Rivers' vocal cords during the procedure, and that Ms. Rivers had not previously given consent for a biopsy. The New York Times confirms that the specialist was present at the clinic in the operating room during the procedure. The health department and the medical examiner are both currently investigating Ms. Rivers' death. It is not clear what lead to the breathing problems that resulted in cardiac arrest—it could have been the procedure itself, or it could have been a mistake with the propofol that was allegedly administered during the procedure.

What we Know About Ms. Rivers' Death

The Washington Post, relying in part on previous reporting by The New York Times, reported earlier this week on what we know about how Ms. Rivers died. A family spokesperson has said that Ms. Rivers was at the Yorkville Endoscopy Clinic so that doctors could work on her vocal cords. A friend of Ms. Rivers told ABC News that the procedure was a diagnostic one to determine why her voice had become raspy. There have been conflicting reports stating that Ms. Rivers took ill during the procedure when a doctor attempted to perform a biopsy on her vocal cords, but the facility claims that it does not perform vocal cord biopsies. The facility also claims that it has never administered general anesthesia.

Whatever happened during the procedure, eventually the clinic called 9-1-1 and reported that a patient was in cardiac arrest. An ambulance took Ms. Rivers to Mount Sinai Hospital. Throughout this whole process various medical personnel attempted to revive her. She was admitted to the hospital, and eventually passed away seven days later.

See Related Posts:

Jurisdictions Differ on the Necessary Scope of Doctor Disclosure

Propofol Is At It… Again

September 10, 2014

Lawsuit Alleges Doctor Didn't Inform Patient of Cancer

by Levin & Perconti

Doctors are in a unique position. Due to their training and experience, we rely on them and trust them in much the same way that very young children rely on and trust their parents. When a doctor violates that trust by failing to provide us with necessary information, the results can be catastrophic. Failing to tell a patient about a diagnosis can be just as bad as a missed diagnosis, because it prevents the patient from taking action. This sort of medical malpractice is extremely dangerous and can have life threatening consequences. That is exactly what is alleged to have happened in a lawsuit in the Chicago area.

Doctor Didn't Tell Patient About Cancer

The Chicago Tribune reported on the lawsuit. According to the suit, a urologist told Edward Hines that he was cancer-free after the doctor removed a tumor from his bladder in early 2011. One week after the surgery, a pathology report showed that Mr. Hines had bladder cancer. Unfortunately, the doctor did not inform Mr. Hines of this result. Of course, the doctor disagrees with this statement of facts and claims that he told Mr. Hines about the cancerous lesion.
According to the suit, however, because the doctor never passed the news along to Mr. Hines, Mr. Hines did not learn about the cancer until he visited a different doctor later that year. Mr. Hines filed suit, but ultimately passed away, so the suit had to be taken over by his daughter Amber Hines. She claims that her dad would have been more likely to survive the cancer if he had known about it earlier. She said in an interview, “We went an entire year without treatment, which was extremely devastating.”

Continue reading "Lawsuit Alleges Doctor Didn't Inform Patient of Cancer" »

September 7, 2014

Blood Pressure Kiosks Not to be Trusted, FDA Warns

by Levin & Perconti

Many Americans struggle with high blood pressure. And even amongst those who do not, many have family members or friends who do. So quite often when we are in the pharmacy, super store, or grocery store we sit down at the blood pressure kiosk, slide an arm into the sleeve, and check our reading. When it is high, we may contact a doctor, but when it is normal or low we breath a sigh of relief and worry no more. A new report, however, says that perhaps we should not rest so easy, because those kiosk readings can be quite inaccurate. And an inaccurate reading can result in a delayed diagnosis of hypertension, which can have serious health consequences. While these kiosks often have warnings on them indicating that they should not be relied on as medical devices, many people do not take those warnings seriously, or read them at all.

FDA says Blood Pressure Kiosks Inaccurate

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an advisory recently about self-service blood pressure kiosks like the ones often found in pharmacies. The advisory explains that correct cuff size is a “critical factor” in measuring blood pressure, and that the cuffs on public kiosks do not fit every user. If the cuff is too small it can result in an artificially high blood pressure reading. If, on the other had, the cuff is too large it may not work at all or, more dangerously, it may result in an artificially low blood pressure reading.

Continue reading "Blood Pressure Kiosks Not to be Trusted, FDA Warns" »

August 30, 2014

Anesthesiology in a World Without a Civil Justice System—Part 4

by Levin & Perconti

The American Association of Justice (AAJ) recently released an article discussing what the country would be like without a civil justice system. In honor of that work we have been addressing various parts of the medical field and how patients would be much worse off without the medical malpractice portion of the civil justice system. This week we are addressing malpractice in anesthesiology.

Medical Malpractice Law Has Decreased Malpractice in Anesthesiology

Continue reading "Anesthesiology in a World Without a Civil Justice System—Part 4" »

August 25, 2014

FDA Warns Patients About Uterine Fibroid Treatment Procedure

by Levin & Perconti

Usually when we think about the risks of surgery, we think about direct risks like surgical error or medical malpractice resulting in postoperative infections or complications. Unfortunately, that is not the only kind of risk one needs to consider when deciding whether to undergo a procedure. Unfortunately patients also need to consider whether and to what extent undergoing the procedure may increase their risk of other health problems in the future. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is currently warning against one such risk.

FDA Warns that Surgical Technique Increases Cancer Risk

Continue reading "FDA Warns Patients About Uterine Fibroid Treatment Procedure" »

August 22, 2014

Judge Blocks FDA's Attempt to Make Generic Version of Sedative Precedex Available

by Levin & Perconti

Reuters reports that a federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order against the FDA which prevents it from allowing the sale of generic versions of a sedative called Precedex. Precedex is manufactured by a drug company called Hospira Inc. However, the court's decision has nothing to do with any sort of medication or pharmaceutical error. The order that the generic drugs not be produced had nothing to do with any kind of medical malpractice. Instead it has to do with drug company profits.

FDA Rules Generic Manufacture Okay, but Court Steps in

The FDA had previously ruled that drugmakers could sell generic Precedex so long as the labeling of the generic drugs left out information about uses that are covered by Hospira's patent on the drug. The patent covers “intensive care unit sedation.” In response, Hospira filed a lawsuit the very next day requesting a restraining order preventing the FDA's ruling from going into effect.

Continue reading "Judge Blocks FDA's Attempt to Make Generic Version of Sedative Precedex Available" »

August 19, 2014

How Wrong Site Surgeries Show Consequences of No Civil Justice System – Part 3

by Levin & Perconti

The American Association for Justice (AAJ) recently published a list of ways in which our society would be substantially different if we did not have a civil justice system. The civil justice system is basically our whole justice system except for the criminal system. It includes things like medical malpractice cases, nursing home abuse cases, products liability cases, and many other areas of law. So in honor of the AAJ's efforts to get out the word about the importance of our civil justice system, we are looking in depth at some of the areas of the medical profession that would be wildly different without a civil justice system. These week we are addressing a truly shocking type of surgical malpractice that would go ungoverned without a civil justice system: wrong site surgeries.

How Common are Wrong Site Surgeries?

Wrong site surgeries are one type of medical malpractice that should never happen. If everyone is doing their job correctly, and proper safety procedures are followed, it should be impossible for a surgeon to wind up operating on the wrong part of a person's body, or even worse, on the wrong person altogether. Unfortunately, it happens all too often. A report by Medscape from just three years ago found that wrong site surgeries happen about forty times a week nationwide.What is an Example of a Wrong Site Surgery?

Continue reading "How Wrong Site Surgeries Show Consequences of No Civil Justice System – Part 3" »

August 15, 2014

Levin & Perconti Wins $1.25 Million Settlement

by Levin & Perconti

The medical malpractice attorneys won a $1.25 million settlement for a client in a wrongful death case. The deceased in the case went to a hospital in July of 2009. During his stay in the hospital he ultimately died.

Sixty-Nine-Year-Old Man Dies Because of Missed Diagnosis

While the sixty-nine-year-old man was in the hospital he received an anticoagulation medication. Anticoagulation medications reduce the blood’s ability to coagulate, or change from a liquid to a semi-solid state. Then he received an MRI of his lumbar spine. That evening he suffered from multiple vasovagal episodes and low blood pressure. Vasovagal episodes involve a rapid drop in a patient’s heart rate which decreases the flow of blood to the brain and can cause fainting. The next morning the gentleman went into fatal cardiac arrest.His death was ultimately attributed to an undiagnosed retroperitoneal hemorrhage. A retroperitoneal hemorrhage is when blood accumulates in the retroperitoneal space. The retroperitoneal space is a space in the abdominal cavity. There are multiple things that can contribute to such a hemorrhage, but one of them is anticoagulation. Other causes include a ruptured aortic aneurysm, a ruptured renal aneurysm, acute pancreatitis, and malignancy.

Continue reading "Levin & Perconti Wins $1.25 Million Settlement" »

August 13, 2014

Illinois Officials Suspend Controversial Psychiatrist’s License to Practice

by Levin & Perconti

The Chicago Tribune reports that Illinois officials have suspended a controversial psychiatrist’s license to practice. The doctor, Dr. Michael Reinstein, prescribed a dangerous antipsychotic drug called clozapine to patients in nursing homes and mental health facilities. Dr. Reinstein prescribed to drug to over half of the patients he was treating. The drug is linked to the potentially wrongful deaths of three of Dr. Reinstein’s patients, resulting in the doctor being accused of fraud. As it turns out, the accusations are substantiated.

The Illinois medical board suspended Dr. Reinstein’s license because it found that he received $350,000 in illegal payments from the maker of clozapine while he disregarded both the drug’s life-threatening effects and the fact that there were other safer treatment options for his patients. Clozapine increases the risk of death in elderly patients and can result in inflammation of the heart wall and seizures. It also has substantial side effects that are not fatal but that seriously impact quality of life, including but not limited to extreme constipation, bedwetting, night-time drooling, muscle stiffness, sedation, tremors, and weight gain. Prescribing such dangerous drugs unnecessarily is a serious type of medication error malpractice.

Continue reading "Illinois Officials Suspend Controversial Psychiatrist’s License to Practice" »

August 9, 2014

How Many People Would Die Due to Hospital Acquired Infections if there Were No Civil Justice System - Part 2

by Levin & Perconti

The American Association for Justice (AAJ) listed a wide variety of ways in which our country would be much worse off if there were no civil justice system in a recent article. We are detailing some of the ways in which health care would be affected if there were no civil justice system. Since medical malpractice law is a part of the civil justice system, eliminating that system would eliminate any recourse patients or their families have when they are hurt by medical professionals. For example, if you or your loved one contracted a severe infection in a hospital due to a hospital's error, you would have no way of making the hospital pay for your increased medical bills.

The AAJ report tells the story of Dickson Clark. Clark had back surgery in Nevada in 2005, and wound up infected with MRSA in the hospital. MRSA, which can be lethal, is a type of staph infection that is drug resistant. As a result if the MRSA infection, Clark suffered through four years of hospitalizations and surgeries, not to mention further infections. Clark died in 2010. And Clark is not alone. According to AAJ, two million hospital patients get infections each year, and as many as 90,000 of them die. These numbers are WITH a civil justice system in place.

Continue reading "How Many People Would Die Due to Hospital Acquired Infections if there Were No Civil Justice System - Part 2" »