February 4, 2011

Illinois Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Spurs Some Hospitals to Ban Cameras in Delivery Rooms

The New York Times reported yesterday on a hot-button issue related to childbirth and medical malpractice. In a move that has angered many families expecting children, some hospitals have banned or restricted the use of cameras during the child delivery process. For many families early photographs and videotapes of the event are priceless memories that are cherished. However, others are not allowed the opportunity to capture those memories as some hospitals move to keep secret the goings-on of a delivery room medical staff.

What is perhaps shocking is that the main motivation for the ban has nothing to do with patient safety but doctor legal protection.

The story explains that the impetus for the rule in many places is the fear that when problems arise juries will be able to see the video. That is exactly what happened in an Illinois medical malpractice lawsuit following the birth of a child at the University of Illinois hospital with shoulder complications and permanent injury. The father in that case had been recording the developing problems, capturing honest reactions from doctors and nurses about what went wrong and what “should” have been done. In that case, the jury ultimately awarded the victims $2.3 million for the medical errors.

One doctor said, “I openly admitted to my co-workers that I practice defensive medicine [and] take offense…that now I have to be videoed to prove that I’m providing good care.”

No national standards dictate the videotaping policy in hospital rooms, so hospitals are free to create a policy of their own. However, when openness and honesty are touted as the keys to superior medical care, there would seem to be nothing to fear from allowing families to tape the moment.

As one hospital’s obstetrics chairman that allows taping explained, “We’re trying to be as transparent as we can. If something goes wrong, we try to explain immediately what happened. A video is not inconsistent with the goal of trying to be transparent.”

Continue reading "Illinois Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Spurs Some Hospitals to Ban Cameras in Delivery Rooms" »

| Share
July 31, 2010

Family Awarded $56 Million Medical Malpractice Award

The Chappaqua-MountKisco Dispatch recently wrote about the latest development in an eye-popping medical malpractice case resulting in a record setting verdict last year.

The Swanson family was awarded $56 million from a medical malpractice jury verdict late last year. The case stemmed from the medical errors that occurred at the Northern Westchester Hospital during the 2003 birth of their son. The couple filed the suit against the hospital and several staff members at the facility including their obstetrician, Dr. Carla Eng-Kohn.

The problems began when the medical staff discovered that the delivery involved shoulder dystocia. Shoulder dystocia is a condition that arises when an unborn child’s shoulders become trapped against the mother’s public bones. The condition does not automatically result in injury to the child so long as medical professionals acting in a timely and appropriate manner.

However, the medical staff at the hospital in this case failed to relieve the dysocia in a timely manner. As a result the baby was delivered with brain damage, nerve damage, internal bleeding, cervical bruising, facial bruising, and arm bruising.

Unfortunately, medical errors during childbirth are a common occurrence at many hospitals. The results of the errors are often catastrophic, leading to lifelong injuries and at times, death. Our Chicago medical malpractice lawyers at Levin & Perconti have fought many legal battles for victims of hospital error during childbirth. For example, in one case we secured a $6.7 million verdict in a case where an inexperienced medical resident performed a vaginal delivery on a breeched baby. The result was, as in this case, was shoulder dystocia leading to a crippling arm injury on the infant.

With so much on the line during childbirth, medical professionals must ensure that they do not commit preventable errors. Please contact our office if you may have been the victim of negligent care during child birth.

| Share
July 18, 2010

Obstetrician Charged with Medical Malpractice in Baby’s Death

A Connecticut doctor whose practice recently closed was sanctioned by state officials and sued for medical malpractice for his handling of a 2008 delivery that resulted in the death of the infant, reports the Norwich Bulletin.

H. John Bodin was investigated by the Department of Public Health after it was reported he failed to properly monitor the patient in labor, ignoring nurse pleas that the labor was not going as expected. Ultimately, the infant required a Cesarean section birth but suffered a lack of oxygen, resulting in brain hemorrhage and injury. The infant died five weeks after the birth.

The Department of Public Health eventually reached a consent disorder with the doctor, fining him $5,000 for the violation and medical negligence in his handling of the infant’s delivery.

Following the investigation, the infant’s mother filed a wrongful death suit against the doctor for the action. She contends that used an excessive amount of Pitocin in the delivery (a drug to stimulate contractions). The legal complaint also indicates that the doctor failed to recognize signs of fetal distress or to intervene by performing the Cesarean section in a timely manner.

Our medical malpractice attorneys at Levin & Perconti understand the perilous situation of most patients when they seek medical care. We have won numerous multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements on behalf of patients who received substandard care during their delivery. Any deviation from the proper standard of care requires proper compensation for the losses they suffer.

If you or anyone you know may have been victims of similar negligent medical care, be sure to contact a medical malpractice lawyer.

| Share